next up previous contents index
Next: Clique Graphsk-null Ordered Up: Applications/New Directions Previous: The Cancellation Problem

Results on the Structure of Fixed Point Sets

 

Aside from the determination whether an ordered set has the fixed point property it certainly is interesting to determine the structure of the fixed point sets. The earliest result in that direction is Theorem 1 in [127] (the fixed point sets of order-preserving maps of a complete lattice are complete lattices themselves) and another well-known result is Theorem 3 in [30] (in finite dismantlable ordered sets the fixed point sets of order-preserving mappings are dismantlable). Surprisingly, despite the apparent strength of the fixed point property, there are ordered sets with the fixed point property that have an order-preserving map whose set of fixed points is disconnected. Examples are the set P2 in [110] (here also depicted in Figure 3 as the set P) and the set tex2html_wrap_inline11946 in [116]. The following is a sufficient criterion for the fixed point sets to be connected.

  prop5465

Proof: Nonemptyness of tex2html_wrap_inline11954 follows for example from Theorem 4.27 or directly from Theorem 3.4 via an easy induction. The proof of connectedness is an induction on n:=|P|. For n=1 there is nothing to prove. For the step tex2html_wrap_inline11960 let P be an (n+1)-element connectedly collapsible ordered set and let tex2html_wrap_inline10762 be as in the definition of connected collapsibility. Let tex2html_wrap_inline11968 be a retraction and let b:=r(x). By definition tex2html_wrap_inline10764 and tex2html_wrap_inline10914 are connectedly collapsible and clearly both sets have tex2html_wrap_inline11976 elements. Thus tex2html_wrap_inline11978 is connected. Clearly tex2html_wrap_inline11980 , and thus tex2html_wrap_inline10246 must be one of the following four sets: H, tex2html_wrap_inline11986 , tex2html_wrap_inline11988 , tex2html_wrap_inline11990 . The case tex2html_wrap_inline11992 is trivial. In all the other cases we have to show that any two elements of tex2html_wrap_inline10246 are joined by a fence in tex2html_wrap_inline10246 .
In case tex2html_wrap_inline11998 we are trivially done if tex2html_wrap_inline12000 , so we will assume tex2html_wrap_inline12002 . Since r(f(b))=b and tex2html_wrap_inline12006 we infer f(b)=x. Moreover tex2html_wrap_inline12010 . Let tex2html_wrap_inline12012 and let tex2html_wrap_inline12014 be a fence in H. If tex2html_wrap_inline12018 , then tex2html_wrap_inline12020 and we are done. If tex2html_wrap_inline12022 , we can assume without loss of generality that there is exactly one index m such that tex2html_wrap_inline12026 and we can assume that tex2html_wrap_inline12028 . If f(x) is not related to x, then (since f(b)=x) f maps tex2html_wrap_inline10914 to itself and thus since tex2html_wrap_inline10914 is connectedly collapsible with tex2html_wrap_inline11976 elements, tex2html_wrap_inline12044 is connected. Hence there is a fence from tex2html_wrap_inline12046 to tex2html_wrap_inline12048 that lies entirely in tex2html_wrap_inline10246 and thus there is a fence from p to q in tex2html_wrap_inline10246 . If f(x) is related to x, there is a smallest fixed point of f that is above x or a largest fixed point of f that is below x. Call this fixed point c. Then tex2html_wrap_inline12072 and p and q are joined by a fence in tex2html_wrap_inline10246 .
In case tex2html_wrap_inline12080 again we will assume that tex2html_wrap_inline12002 (the case tex2html_wrap_inline12000 is treated when tex2html_wrap_inline12086 ). Again we infer f(b)=x. If tex2html_wrap_inline12090 , then we must have tex2html_wrap_inline12092 and we are done. Otherwise there is a fixed point tex2html_wrap_inline12094 of f that is related to b and not equal to b or x. Since f(b)=x, we have that d is related to x also. Let tex2html_wrap_inline12110 . Since d is related to x we can assume that tex2html_wrap_inline12116 . Let tex2html_wrap_inline12014 be a fence in H. Again we are done unless tex2html_wrap_inline12026 for exactly one m and (without loss of generality) tex2html_wrap_inline12028 . Since f(b)=x, we have tex2html_wrap_inline12130 and p and q are joined by a fence in tex2html_wrap_inline10246 .
Finally in case tex2html_wrap_inline12138 let us first assume tex2html_wrap_inline12002 . Then we are done if x is comparable to b. Otherwise f maps tex2html_wrap_inline10914 to itself, so x and b have a common upper bound in tex2html_wrap_inline10246 and thus tex2html_wrap_inline10246 is connected. In case tex2html_wrap_inline12000 , we have that tex2html_wrap_inline12160 . If f(b) is related to x (and thus to b), then there is a point in H that is above x or below x and thus tex2html_wrap_inline11990 is connected. If f(b) is not related to x, then f maps tex2html_wrap_inline10914 to itself. Hence again there is a point in H that is above x or below x and thus tex2html_wrap_inline11990 is connected. \

cor5483

Proof: It is proved by Fofanova, Rival and Rutkowski in [44] that every ordered set of dimension 2 has a retractable point. The same result is proved for interval dimension 2 in [120]. Since (interval) dimension is a hereditary concept this means that each ordered set of (interval) dimension 2 is collapsible. The result now follows from Theorem 4.27 and Proposition 5.6. \


next up previous contents index
Next: Clique Graphsk-null Ordered Up: Applications/New Directions Previous: The Cancellation Problem

Bernd.S.W.Schroder